Rebuilding A Broken Union

Brexit has exposed existential threats to the EU. President Macron and Chancellor Merkel have warned that, if the organisation cannot reform itself soon, then it will fall apart. How then, should the union go forward?

Many people within the upper echelons of the EU wish to formalise the idea that there are different “levels” of membership. This is due to the fact that many member states have sought and attained opt-outs from EU laws surrounding security and the common currency, the euro.

The UK is one of these countries, which is a member (for now), but always floats around the edges of the union, gaining opt-outs almost whenever it wants to. However, this pushed Britain to the edge and led to Brexit, with a sense of superiority to our European counterparts emerging.

However, if the idea of an “outsider” relationship could be formalised, then there would likely be overwhelming support for Britain staying in the EU. This will also help to prevent future exits from the European Union, with many countries such as Ireland and Denmark opposing the move towards an almost federalist European project.

In addition, a formal, tiered system could help to draw in those European states that do not wish to join the EU at the moment, such as Switzerland. This would bolster the trade bloc and help to increase the size of the single market and free trade within Europe, without losing sovereignty.

There are a few different ideas for how exactly this should be done.

One of these, and the most prominent, is to have three different tiers of membership:

  • An inner circle, consisting of the member states most committed to the project. These states would be part of the borderless Schengen Area, the Eurozone, and would be subject to every law passed by the European Parliament. They would take the part in European elections, and be represented.
  • A middle-ground, consisting of the member states, like the UK, Ireland, and Denmark, who want to have free trade but don’t want to be party to most rules of the EU. They would have a loose relationship but still be part of the EU.
  • An outer circle, consisting of countries currently in EFTA (Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Switzerland) and any country outside of all European organisations that wishes to join this outer circle. This would have a comprehensive free trade agreement with the rest of the EU — as it currently does — and be much in the model of the current EFTA.

Another idea is to divide countries into different currency zones for the differing economies within Europe.

Currently, there is only the one European currency, the Euro. It has caused and exacerbated multiple problems, as countries who sign up to the Euro lose the ability to adapt interest rates to solve their own economic problems. This wouldn’t be an issue if all economies in the Eurozone were similar — as it was supposed to be — but countries such as Greece and Spain have been allowed to join.

Therefore, a reformed EU could incorporate two or three different currencies, each ruled by their own central bank. There would be, for example, a currency for the wealthier economies and one for the weaker ones. This would prevent economic issues caused by a single currency, and also allow currency to continue to serve as a symbol of political unity.

Politics nerd, policy wonk | Founder, medium.com/politics-fast-and-slow | Editor, politika.org.uk | twitter.com/dave_olsen16 | Policy Paper: https://rb.gy/7coyj

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store